White Attitudes Towards Nature Essay -- Racial Relations, Indian, Whit

In Luther standing(a) stands Nature and Louis Owenss The American Indian natural state, the authors dictate differences in Indian and white relationships with record. They stress how Indians see nature, their match relationship with it, and how they know wilderness is that a European head. though agreeing here, Standing Bear focuses on the Lakota mentation of how Indians truly lived while Owens reveals both sides and thinks white take ins can shift with time.Standing Bear thinks the difference in how whites and Indians see nature stems from childhood. He believes Indian children are aware of nature because they have been taught to become conscious of life and spend time just observing the wild things around them (9). By seeing the world this way, their cope and respect for it flourishes (Standing Bear 10). This appreciation sharply contrasts to ignorant whites who foolishly symbolise as children, ignoring everything but each other, and grow up disregarding the cognition nat ure gives and viewing it only as something to use. He says whites are tire with nature because they do not have the Indian point of view (11). This distance whites have from nature harms their relationship with nature and humans, making them less(prenominal) compassionate when they do not see that mans heart, by from nature, becomes hard (12).Similarly, Owens says whites see nature differently because of childhood experiences. Instead of emergence up in nature daily, white children go on periodic vacations camping, and thus view nature as a tourist draw poker instead of a second home. He states Indians embrace nature because it has a stronger family significance to them that whites do not see. Indians call the Cascades the Great generate because of stories they have hear... ...e two races could not understand each other (Standing Bear 12). On the other hand, Owens has hope for whites because he did not grow up with Indian traditions. He has seen whites preserving nature when he was sent to burn the shed, so even though they do not yet understand it he has hope that they can one day appreciate it.Indians understand and grade nature more than whites and these authors recognize that. They believe the trouble with white attitudes is they do not truly see nature or form a harmonious relationship with it, and whites think they can be separated from their idea of wilderness. Although Standing Bear is critical of whites and believes they will never change, Owens thinks they will if they offer to redefine how they view nature. Overall, both authors want whites to respect the Indian view of nature and aspire to see it that way also.