Friday, February 22, 2019
Avid Pharmaceuticals
The greet structure with the lower breakable volume has the lower taxonomical risk. Fluctuations in sales volume has an impact on net income. Because in that location is no certainty, oscillate must be ready for increments and decreases in sales if the upstart equipment is purchased. It is important for Waver to understand that the caller-out allow non always be at normal operating(a) levels. Some beats more(prenominal) units will need to be produced and oftentimes, less units will need to be produced due to the demand in sales. Fluctuations in demand will venture the bottom line, as seen in the examples above. ) What other factors should Waver consider in making this decision? Will the quality of the crossing remain the equivalent? Is the simple machine more efficient than the workers? Will time be relieve? Can the machine produce more than 60,000 units per year? How some(prenominal) units elicit the equipment produce in a year, while maintaining a quality product ? Can the company charge more for the product if thither is an increase in quality? How will this equipment affect Waver long-term? short-term? Will upgrades be needed (added expenses)? How quickly will the equipment be overage? How quickly can the equipment be installed?Will there be a loss of manufacturing products while the equipment is being pieceup? Will the company ache money during setup due to lack of doing? How will this new piece of equipment show on the companys financial statements? Will it be depreciated? What fake of depreciation? Are there new asset conversions that the accounting department will have to record? Do the product costs and/or period costs change? Is it possible to make other areas more efficient, therefore, reducing fixed or variable costs? What company makes the manufacturing equipment? Is the company successful/re trustable?Is the company new? Is the return on the enthronization funds satisfactory to board members and owners? How does the new e quipment affect the employees? Will additional pedagogy be needed? Who will operate and manage this new equipment? How knotty would it be to get overhaul if repairs were needed? How dependable are the service repair people? Will Waver have to hire a full time employee to fix the repairs? This salary is an additional expense. How dependable is the machine? Will the equipment affect the factory layout, efficiency, create toxic smells or be too loud for workers to be near it?Will customer expiation be increased? Will the employees operating the machine be paying(a) more, therefore, increasing salary Will training occur? This is an added expense. Are there enough Jobs to reassign all employees displaced to new Jobs within Waver? How will Waver communicate this wide-ranging change to its employees? How much does the machine cost? Are there additional variable costs that will be incurred? (4) What is your recommendation? This does not look like a good investment for Waver. The retur n on investment is low at the normal 60,000 operating volume. The fixed costs are large, Jumping by 476,000.That is a large increase when the sales at normal operating conditions will single yield an extra $4,000. It is not worth the expense. In the beginning, the equipment may be slow to operate at normal volume due to set up, training, glitches, etc. There may be a length of time where Waver is not able to produce and sell 60,000 units per year, which will impairment Wavers bottom line (as seen in the 25% volume decrease in example above). The new equipment seems like a risky investment. The choice of production structure (with the new equipment or without) depends on the expected future sales.If Waver was certain they could produce and sell more than 60,000 units per year, this may be an investment worth looking into, however, this is an unknown. Making a little less than the 60,000 units (59,500 units), would put Waver in the same position had they not purchased the new equipm ent. This orient at which both cost structures intersect is what is relevant. From a managements perspective, this new equipment is unfeignedly not a good idea. There are too many What ifs and too many personnel and training issues that could be factors. I would not recommend purchasing this new equipment for Waver.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment